Student feedback sheet
STUDENT FEEDBACK
All marks are recommendations only and are subject to approval by the Board of Examiners, having been processed by the Department's Academic Quality Procedure.
Surname |
|
First name(s) |
|
Student Number |
|
Project Title |
|
||||
Degree |
|
||||
Supervisor |
|
||||
2nd Assessor |
|
Assessment Status (Please Tick) |
|||
Assessment Completed |
|
No assessment possible at this time. Referred for investigation for plagiarism. The concerns are indicated in the comments below; if you have any explanation, please return to the course office, in writing within 7 days |
|
Performance at Oral (tick as necessary) |
Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory |
Comment |
Demonstration that written work is that of the candidate |
|
|
|
Ability to communicate effectively and answer questions |
|
|
See attached the Mark Criteria grid for an explanation of the following matrix
Criteria |
80+ |
70-79 |
60–69 |
50-59 |
40-49 |
30-39 |
20-29 |
<20 |
Formulate a research question suitable for the degree and consistent with the time and resource available to conduct the research. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critically evaluate the corpus of research, synthesising relevant ideas into a referenced literature review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select and apply appropriate research methods to suit the requirements of a specific research question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devise and perform an investigation, informed by the findings of previous researchers and efficiently utilising available resource. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct research in an ethically responsible manner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present findings with clarity, appropriately evaluating the confidence that should be placed in any findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrate authoritative intellectual ownership of findings presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan and monitor an extended piece of research, reporting progress to interested parties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manage project risk appropriately, applying suitable mitigations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>70% |
69-60% |
59-50% |
49-40% |
<40% |
Recommended Dissertation Mark Range |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments by Assessors, in particular indicating areas of particular strength and weaknesses. |
|